Deontae Lawson’s words after his team’s recent performance left a strong impression on fans and commentators alike. Reflecting on his team’s performance and the noticeable difference in intensity, Lawson said, *“I don’t feel like we had the same intensity as we did against Georgia. Like, that week, that preparation.”* It’s a sentiment that resonates deeply, especially considering how crucial the level of intensity is in high-stakes matchups.
The game against Georgia, which Lawson is referring to, was a standout for the team. From the first whistle to the final minute, the players demonstrated a sense of urgency, focus, and execution that led to an emphatic victory. The preparation during that week was intense – the coaching staff, players, and support staff all dialed in, ensuring no stone was left unturned. Everyone knew the significance of the contest, and the commitment was evident in every play on the field. It was a complete performance where the players’ intensity matched their preparation, and it showed in their execution.
However, Lawson’s comment suggests a stark contrast in the team’s approach and output in their latest match. The lack of the same intensity could be attributed to several factors. It’s possible that after such a high-energy performance, the players might have underestimated the challenge of the following game or didn’t replicate the same focus during preparation. There’s also the mental fatigue that can come from back-to-back intense contests, which sometimes leads to a drop in concentration and energy levels. But Lawson’s observation speaks to something more profound: intensity isn’t just physical. It’s mental, it’s emotional, and it’s about maintaining a certain mindset every single time you step onto the field.
In competitive sports, consistency is key, and it’s clear that Lawson is frustrated by the team’s failure to bring that same level of focus and drive. His words also indicate that the team’s performance wasn’t just about a tactical mismatch or an opponent outplaying them; it was about the internal mindset and how the team approached the game leading up to it. Intensity is an internal fuel that drives external results, and Lawson’s comments highlight the importance of ensuring that intensity is present, regardless of the opponent or circumstances.
It’s not uncommon for teams to struggle with consistency, especially after a big win or a high-profile match. The psychological challenge of maintaining that edge is tough, but Lawson’s insight suggests a growing understanding among the players that they need to bring their best week in and week out. This is a lesson that championship-winning teams know all too well — it’s not enough to play one great game; the intensity needs to be consistent across every matchup, regardless of the opponent’s stature or the stage of the season.
Lawson’s self-awareness and honesty in assessing the team’s performance are valuable leadership qualities. Acknowledging the lack of intensity is the first step to ensuring it doesn’t happen again. The team’s coaches and players will likely take this as a call to refocus, dig deeper into their preparation, and ensure they bring the same level of intensity to every game moving forward. After all, intensity isn’t something that can be turned on and off at will — it needs to be cultivated consistently, from the very first practice to the final whistle of every match.
Be the first to comment